The unpredictable landscape of college basketball often sees powerhouses falter after seasons of lofty expectations. Just as the North Carolina Tar Heels experienced a surprising downturn after their Sweet 16 appearance, the upcoming 2025-26 season is poised to witness several prominent programs struggle to maintain their recent standards, prompting a critical look at potential regression.
Sustaining success in the current era of college basketball has become an increasingly formidable challenge. The fluidity of rosters due to the NCAA Transfer Portal demands constant vigilance, with coaches needing to simultaneously re-recruit their existing players while aggressively pursuing new talent from high school and the portal to remain competitive. This relentless cycle means even a moment of complacency can lead to an upstart program seizing an advantage.
A prime example of a team facing a potential dip is the Saint Mary’s Gaels. After an impressive run of eleven consecutive West Coast Conference regular-season titles, culminating in back-to-back championships, their stronghold on the league was undeniable. However, the Gaels are now tasked with overcoming the loss of four of their top five scorers, including their leading scorer, and six of their top nine overall, signaling a significant rebuilding effort for a program accustomed to sustained excellence.
Similarly, the Maryland Terrapins, fresh off their most successful season in nearly a decade, reaching the NCAA Tournament’s second weekend with 27 wins, are on the cusp of a challenging period. Despite a strategic acquisition from the transfer portal, the departure of their entire starting lineup—players who delivered exceptional production—means the Terrapins will find it incredibly difficult to replicate last season’s achievements. A step back for Maryland appears almost inevitable given these significant roster changes.
The Clemson Tigers also face an uphill battle to avoid a substantial decline. Following two strong years, their roster has undergone a major overhaul, bringing in a six-man transfer haul that includes Ian Schieffelin and RJ Godfrey. For Clemson to bypass a steep drop-off, these new additions must integrate seamlessly and contribute significantly and immediately, especially with the departure of their all-ACC forward, necessitating a reliance on newly acquired talent to fill critical voids.
The Michigan State Spartans, a perennial contender, are likewise projected to regress after an outstanding season that saw them reach the Elite Eight. The unexpected departure of Jase Richardson to the NBA Draft, combined with other key transfers, has created unforeseen tremors within the program. The loss of their arguably best three guards from last season, including defensive stalwarts like Jaden Akins and Tre Holloman, leaves a significant void in their backcourt and perimeter defense.
While Michigan State’s defensive framework remains robust with players like Jeremy Fears Jr. and Carson Cooper poised to contribute, the collective prowess of their plus perimeter defenders is no longer present. Furthermore, the Spartans’ offense seems destined for a considerable step back, as several projected starters, including Fears, Cooper, and Coen Carr, possess notable shooting limitations. Despite tactical efforts in the transfer portal, critical injuries further complicate their immediate prospects.
Nevertheless, Michigan State maintains a high floor, anchored by their strong 3-point defense and rebounding abilities. The presence of players like Fears, who is a fast-break machine, provides a solid foundation for competency. However, the cumulative impact of losing key playmakers like Richardson, Holloman, and Kaleb Glenn means the Spartans are likely to be closer to a top-30 team than a top-eight contender in the competitive landscape of college basketball, illustrating the cyclical challenges faced by even the most consistent programs.
Leave a Reply