The rise of artificial intelligence has permeated nearly every aspect of modern life, and now, it’s even offering unsolicited beauty advice. In a captivating real-world experiment, one British mother embarked on a unique “glow up” journey, putting her appearance entirely in the hands of a sophisticated AI chatbot, ChatGPT, with surprising and thought-provoking results that challenge conventional beauty standards and self-perception in the digital age.
For those navigating the lexicon of contemporary online culture, a “glow up” signifies a significant, positive personal transformation, often visually dramatic, reminiscent of the iconic makeovers seen in popular late nineties and early noughties coming-of-age films. This concept has found fertile ground on social media platforms, where individuals increasingly seek advice—and validation—for appearance enhancements, pushing the boundaries of traditional beauty advice into algorithmic realms.
Flora Gill, an eight-month postpartum mother, candidly admitted that the demands of new motherhood had led her to neglect her personal appearance. Seeking an objective perspective and perhaps a push towards rejuvenation, she decided to upload a photograph of herself to ChatGPT, posing a simple yet profound question: “How can I look as amazing as possible?” This marked the inception of her AI-driven beauty quest, a digital transformation unlike any other.
The AI’s response was startlingly detailed and, at times, uncomfortably direct. Far from offering generic suggestions, ChatGPT provided a precise critique of Flora’s perceived “shortfalls.” It pinpointed specific areas for improvement, from her “straw-like hair” needing lighter balayage and professional gloss to her “straight eyelashes” that apparently made her eyes look tired, and even suggested Botox for crow’s feet she hadn’t realized she possessed.
The chatbot then unveiled an extensive and costly regimen of cosmetic treatments curated specifically for Flora. Recommendations included microneedling to stimulate collagen, ultherapy for skin lifting and tightening, and Botox for a brow lift and to reduce nasolabial folds. Beyond injectables, it prescribed a litany of expensive facials—hydrafacials, vampire facials, and chemical peels—alongside high-end booking links, illustrating the AI’s comprehensive, high-budget approach to beauty.
Flora’s reaction swung from suspicion to stark realization of the financial implications, estimating the bot’s proposed annual makeover at around £12,000. Sensing her hesitation, the AI promptly offered a “budget” alternative, still ranging from £2,000 to £3,000 annually. This interaction highlighted the commercial underpinnings of AI beauty advice, subtly nudging users towards expensive procedures despite their personal financial boundaries.
The experiment culminated with Flora requesting an AI-generated image of her post-makeover self. The resulting depiction, a “cartoonish AI character” with impossibly flawless features and a sculpted jawline, left her gasping. This final visualization underscored the chasm between AI’s algorithmic ideal of beauty and human reality, prompting Flora to issue a cautionary warning: trusting AI with self-image can be a “sadomasochistic flogging of all your insecurities.”
Flora’s experience serves as a potent reminder of the complex relationship between technology, self-perception, and beauty ideals in our hyper-visual society. While the allure of an AI-prescribed “glow up” journey may be strong, her story urges individuals to exercise discretion, questioning whether an algorithm’s unfeeling assessment should dictate personal well-being or contribute to insecurities rather than fostering genuine self-acceptance and confidence. This digital transformation raises critical questions about who defines beauty in the age of intelligent machines.
Leave a Reply