A groundbreaking new Royal Biography of Princess Margaret has ignited a royal firestorm, asserting that her famously troubled life stemmed from an “invisible disability” linked to the Queen Mother’s alleged heavy drinking during pregnancy. This sensational claim challenges long-held perceptions of the late British Royals’ struggles, presenting a controversial re-evaluation of her early years and subsequent challenges within the Royal Family.
At the core of Meryle Secrest’s unofficial account is the extraordinary contention that the King’s aunt suffered from Foetal Alcohol Syndrome (FASD). Published 23 years after Princess Margaret’s passing, the book meticulously investigates a genetic predisposition within the aristocratic Bowes-Lyon clan for alcohol consumption, suggesting a profound influence on Margaret’s development.
The author cites a revealing 1925 letter from the then-pregnant Queen Mother to her future husband, expressing a disinclination for wine, alongside later accounts from equerries detailing her daily regimen of Dubonnet, wine, and cocktails. Secrest argues that prevailing medical opinions of the era would not have warned the Queen Mother against alcohol, as the placenta was believed to shield the foetus.
These alleged maternal drinking habits are presented as the pre-ordained source of Princess Margaret’s various reported issues, including stunted growth, difficulties with fine motor skills like holding a pen, and recurring migraines. The Royal Biography posits that these physical and developmental challenges were manifestations of an undiagnosed Foetal Alcohol Syndrome.
However, these assertions have met with strong skepticism and bemusement from Princess Margaret’s close friends and family within the Royal Family. They vehemently dismiss the claims as “bizarre” and “ridiculous,” arguing that the Princess was an intelligent woman with a rich social life and a loving family. Friends also counter specific physical descriptions, noting her elegant handwriting and typical British Royals stature.
Veteran royal commentator Richard Kay offers an alternative perspective, suggesting that Princess Margaret’s life was far less complex than the Royal Biography implies. He posits that her challenges stemmed primarily from a privileged upbringing that left her ill-equipped for her evolving royal status, transitioning from heir presumptive to a secondary figure after her sister, Queen Elizabeth II, ascended the throne.
The narrative draws a subtle contrast with Queen Elizabeth’s life of rigorous duty, highlighting how both sisters from the Royal Family were raised in an environment where alcohol was ubiquitous in social and official settings. While the book stops short of direct comparisons, it subtly hints at how different societal contexts and personal responsibilities shaped their respective paths, with Princess Margaret’s life largely defined by amusement and pleasure.
Ultimately, the Royal Biography prompts a re-examination of how early life experiences, including potential prenatal influences of the Queen Mother’s habits, can impact an individual’s journey. Yet, it also underscores the enduring debate about attributing complex personal struggles solely to a single factor, particularly when close acquaintances offer compelling alternative explanations for Princess Margaret’s later inclination towards drinking and loneliness.
Despite the sensational claims of Foetal Alcohol Syndrome, the article ultimately suggests that Princess Margaret’s personal struggles, including her unraveling marriage and later health issues, might be more simply understood as responses to life’s challenges, rather than a pre-determined neurological condition. Her life, like many British Royals, was shaped by a confluence of privilege, personal choices, and societal expectations.
Leave a Reply