The landscape of professional boxing stands on the precipice of a profound transformation, driven by proposed legislative changes that threaten to fundamentally alter its competitive and financial structures, potentially enabling a Saudi-backed venture to consolidate unprecedented control over the sport.
Whispers of this impending shift first surfaced when Ari Emanuel, CEO of TKO Holdings Group (owners of UFC and WWE), cryptically alluded to an overhaul of the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act in early 2025. These rumors coalesced into concrete action last week with the introduction of the Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act in Congress by Representatives Brian Jack and Sharice Davids.
While proponents champion the bill as a necessary modernization aimed at fostering investment and improving fighter welfare, its detailed provisions suggest a strategic maneuvering to create “alternatives” to boxing’s long-established sanctioning bodies, thereby undercutting the very protections the original Ali Act was designed to uphold.
At the heart of this legislative push is TKO’s ambitious new boxing venture, Zuffa Boxing, a collaboration with Sela, an entertainment arm of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, and orchestrated by the influential Turki al-Sheikh. This high-profile promotion, slated to launch with a major bout in September 2025, represents Saudi Arabia’s significant financial foray into dominating the global boxing scene.
The proposed legislation paves the way for the creation of Unified Boxing Organizations (UBOs), a model Zuffa Boxing is expected to adopt. This structure grants immense power to the promoter, allowing them to unilaterally determine fighter rankings and championship belts, effectively establishing a parallel boxing ecosystem where Saudi interests dictate the sport’s hierarchy and undermine existing promoters.
Though the bill includes provisions for minimum payments and safety standards, which could theoretically benefit emerging boxers, these requirements simultaneously erect substantial barriers to entry for smaller organizations. Such a framework disproportionately advantages well-resourced entities like Zuffa Boxing, enabling them to monopolize talent and control the sport’s future, a model eerily similar to the UFC’s criticized fighter compensation practices.
The original Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act, enacted in 2000, was a landmark piece of bipartisan legislation crafted specifically to combat the exploitative and anti-competitive practices prevalent in boxing. It introduced federal oversight, transparency, and financial disclosures to protect athletes, standing as the only instance of direct Congressional regulation in U.S. professional sports.
Critics, including combat sports regulatory lawyer Erik Magraken, argue that while the new bill doesn’t outright repeal the Ali Act, it creates loopholes for promoters to control titles and rankings, thereby stripping boxers of their leverage and economic independence. The surprising support from Ali’s widow, Lonnie Ali, and co-sponsor Rep. Davids’ past ties to UFC’s reality show circuit highlight the sophisticated lobbying efforts by TKO and Emanuel.
Ultimately, this legislative initiative aligns perfectly with Saudi Arabia’s broader geopolitical strategy: leveraging massive financial investment to acquire unparalleled influence, meticulously shape public narratives, and establish self-sustaining ecosystems across various global sports. The meteoric rise of Turki al-Sheikh as a dominant figure in boxing, often referred to as “His Excellency,” exemplifies this strategic cultural soft power, where financial might often overshadows critical scrutiny.
Leave a Reply