Children’s social care services across the UK are on the brink of significant upheaval, facing a “devastating impact” due to proposed changes in local authority funding by the government. This critical sector, responsible for safeguarding and supporting vulnerable young people, stands to suffer profound consequences if current plans for funding distribution proceed unchecked, raising alarms among advocacy groups and local councils alike.
The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government has initiated a consultation process aimed at revising the core council funding allocation methodology, effective from the 2026/27 financial year. These adjustments are poised to reshape how vital resources are distributed to local authorities, with particular scrutiny on the formula’s potential implications for social care funding and overall public services impact.
London Councils, a body representing the capital’s boroughs, has vociferously warned against these proposals, highlighting a severe risk of “dramatically underestimating levels of need” nationwide. Claire Holland, Chair of London Councils and Labour leader of Lambeth Council, emphasized the long-overdue nature of council funding reform but stressed the absolute necessity for equitable and efficient distribution based on genuine need.
Holland specifically articulated serious concerns regarding the proposed children’s services formula, asserting that its current design risks a critical miscalculation of demand in major urban centers like London and other parts of the country. This potential misjudgment could lead to inadequate resources for areas with high levels of child vulnerability, exacerbating existing pressures on children’s services.
Further compounding these anxieties, a recent study by the National Children’s Bureau critically assessed the new, “unique” funding formula for children’s services, concluding that it possesses “questionable overall robustness and accuracy.” This independent evaluation adds significant weight to the growing chorus of voices urging a re-evaluation of the government’s approach to local government funding.
The report pointed out several key deficiencies, including a glaring lack of comprehensive testing and the use of metrics that “are not correlated with need.” Crucially, the exclusion of housing costs—a particularly significant expenditure in regions like London—from the funding calculations is expected to skew allocations, creating a distorted picture of true service requirements and impacting council finances.
Moreover, the proposed measure of child health was criticized for its subjectivity, with the National Children’s Bureau recommending more objective and accurate indicators. Figures on special educational needs and disability (SEND) were suggested as a superior alternative, capable of capturing a much broader and more precise spectrum of need within children’s services.
James Shutkever, social care programme lead at the National Children’s Bureau, issued a firm call to action, urging the government to meticulously consider the recommendations put forth in their report. He emphasized the importance of refining the proposals to ensure that the funding formula genuinely aligns with its stated purpose: to be fundamentally based on need.
Despite these widespread concerns from local authorities and children’s welfare organizations, the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government has maintained its stance. The ministry insists that the proposed changes adequately “account for specific demand on services in London and will deliver fairer funding for all councils” across the nation, standing by their reform agenda.
Leave a Reply