Winston Churchill’s poignant reminder that “Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” resonates deeply as Iowa faces a critical juncture concerning its invaluable historical legacy. Before individuals can grasp the profound implications of historical repetition, they must first understand the foundational history that shapes their present. This core principle is now under threat as decisions concerning Iowa’s public historical resources spark widespread alarm.
A recent controversial announcement by Iowa’s Department of Administrative Services (DAS) indicates the abrupt closure of the State Historical Society of Iowa (SHSI) Library in Iowa City. This move, affecting a vital institution that has served Iowans since 1857, has raised significant concerns among historians, educators, and the public alike. Many view this as an administrative action with little apparent regard for the agency’s mission or for the Iowans who will consequently lose access to a crucial piece of the state’s heritage.
The assertion that the Iowa City archives are largely duplicated by the Des Moines collection is a significant misconception that experts emphatically refute. Linda Brown, who dedicated 23 years as the librarian at the SHSI Library in Iowa City, clarified in a letter to Governor Reynolds that the overlap is, at most, 20%. She underscored the unique depth and breadth of the Iowa City library’s collection, particularly its extensive holdings of 19th and early 20th-century publications, which are entirely unique and incomparable to any other collection in the state.
This is not merely an issue of historical access; it is fundamentally an Iowa public education issue. Public education transcends the confines of traditional schools and universities, extending to invaluable resources like the Iowa City archives. The closure directly impacts students, researchers, and the general public who rely on these rich, accessible historical materials for learning, research, and understanding their shared past, undermining efforts for comprehensive historical preservation.
Remarkably, this contentious matter transcends partisan lines. There is no “red” or “blue” side in this debate; instead, it boils down to a fundamental decision about whether to actively protect Iowa history or allow its erosion through administrative oversight. The loss of these resources represents an irreversible blow to the public’s ability to engage with and learn from their heritage, impacting future generations.
Critics also point to the governor’s consistent pattern of decision-making, characterizing the abrupt closure announcement as another example of an arrogant, secretive, and heavy-handed style that disregards government transparency. Excuses citing confidentiality and executive privilege have become increasingly unconvincing in the face of widespread public demand for open and accountable governance regarding crucial state assets.
For concerned citizens eager to preserve these invaluable public resources and advocate for greater oversight, particularly through public hearings, direct action is encouraged. Engaging with legislators and making their wishes known is crucial to ensure that Iowa’s rich historical archives remain accessible for all. This collective effort is essential to safeguard the integrity of our shared past.
