Former President Donald Trump recently launched a scathing attack on the Wall Street Journal during an interview on Newsmax, accusing the esteemed publication of resembling a ‘gossip page’ rather than a reputable news source.

The tirade unfolded as Trump discussed his ongoing legal dispute with the Journal, stemming from their reporting on a controversial letter he allegedly sent to convicted financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. Despite his vehement denials, the paper’s accounts have presented contradictory facts, fueling the former president’s public frustration.

Newsmax host Rob Finnerty probed Trump on his strained relationship with Rupert Murdoch’s media empire, particularly questioning the Journal’s perceived antagonism. Trump’s response sharply contrasted the Journal with the New York Post, which he lauded as ‘terrific’ under Keith Poole’s leadership, further highlighting his selective praise and criticism within the Murdoch portfolio.

The former president reiterated his belief that the Wall Street Journal has been ‘terrible’ and ‘very, very dishonest’ in its coverage pertaining to him. He likened its content to mere ‘gossip,’ suggesting a fundamental departure from its traditional journalistic standards in its approach to his public image and actions.

Explaining his defensive stance, Trump articulated a perceived duty to ‘protect myself,’ ‘protect my voters,’ and ‘protect MAGA’ against what he considers erroneous reporting. He asserted that such vigilance was crucial for his political survival and continued influence, framing his confrontations as essential battles for his base.

Trump expanded his argument by referencing what he termed ‘phony’ incidents, including the ‘Russia, Russia, Russia hoax’ – a claim that lacks factual basis regarding election interference – and ‘many other hoaxes.’ This broad generalization serves to underpin his narrative of pervasive media bias and a need for constant self-defense.

His accusations against the Wall Street Journal specifically honed in on dishonesty, suggesting a deliberate campaign of misinformation rather than journalistic error. This strong condemnation underscores the intensity of his animosity towards the publication and his perception of its credibility.

The incident provides a clear illustration of Trump’s long-standing adversarial relationship with segments of the press, where critical reporting is frequently met with sharp rebukes and accusations of bias. It highlights the deeply polarized media landscape in contemporary American politics.