A highly sensitive, recently leaked government memo has brought to light a controversial proposal detailing extensive and prolonged involvement of the United States military in nationwide deportation efforts. This revelation suggests a significant strategic shift within domestic policy, potentially reshaping the landscape of immigration enforcement for years to come.

The document, reportedly penned by Phil Hegseth, a senior advisor within the Department of Homeland Security and brother to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, underscores the gravity and high-level consideration of these plans. Its emergence has ignited considerable debate regarding the boundaries of military engagement in civilian affairs.

At its core, the memorandum outlines a comprehensive strategy for integrating armed forces into the ongoing mass deportation agenda. This move signals a dramatic escalation of current enforcement tactics, far beyond traditional border control, extending deep into communities across the nation.

Intriguingly, the memo acknowledges previous deployments of troops for similar operations, conceding that these earlier efforts were not “perfect.” This admission hints at lessons learned and a desire for more effective, perhaps more forceful, future implementations of immigration enforcement.

Furthermore, the leaked text contains a sobering forecast, indicating an expectation of sustained civil unrest, including “LA-style riots,” in response to these heightened deportation activities. Disturbingly, the document suggests that such disturbances could persist for “years to come,” painting a bleak picture of future societal challenges.

The blueprint for this expanded military role reportedly stems from a critical June 21 meeting involving senior officials from both the Department of Homeland Security and the Pentagon. Their discussions centered on leveraging the military’s “nationwide operational planning capabilities” to enhance “national security and illegal immigration” measures.

The long-term vision articulated within the memo is particularly striking, advising various departments on how to “better plan” for these operations. It explicitly suggests a continuous, multi-year requirement for U.S. military members to execute these extensive deportation efforts, solidifying a permanent role for the armed forces in domestic immigration policy.

This unprecedented proposal raises profound questions about civil liberties, the militarization of domestic law enforcement, and the future direction of immigration policy. The potential implications of such widespread military involvement in civilian affairs warrant urgent scrutiny and public discussion.