Recent events have thrust Lionel Messi’s personal security into the spotlight, as his dedicated bodyguard, Yassine Cheuko, has received a significant ban from the remainder of the Leagues Cup 2025 campaign. This unprecedented decision by the tournament’s disciplinary committee underscores a critical review of pitchside conduct and the roles of non-playing personnel during high-stakes matches. The ban on Cheuko represents a notable development for Inter Miami FC and the wider world of football security.
The immediate cause for Cheuko’s prohibition stems from an incident that unfolded in the aftermath of a contentious match against Atlas in Miami. Following a dramatic 96th-minute victory for Javier Mascherano’s side, courtesy of Marcelo Weigandt’s late goal, Cheuko became embroiled in a heated discussion. Witnesses reported that while attempting to ensure the safety of Lionel Messi, the former Navy SEAL appeared to push an Atlas player, a move that quickly escalated into a disciplinary matter.
The Leagues Cup disciplinary committee acted swiftly, confirming the ban in an official statement that, while not explicitly naming Yassine Cheuko, detailed the reasons for the suspension. The committee’s ruling, in accordance with the tournament regulations, found the individual guilty of “improper conduct” and consequently barred him from all technical areas for the duration of Leagues Cup 2025, also imposing an undisclosed fine on Inter Miami CF. This marks a firm stance on maintaining order around the playing field.
The official communication, intentionally vague regarding the individual’s identity, highlighted the seriousness with which the Leagues Cup authorities view such breaches of conduct. Despite the lack of a direct name mention, the context of the incident and widespread media reports left little doubt that the suspension was indeed directed at Messi’s bodyguard. The focus remained squarely on upholding the integrity of the game and ensuring a safe environment for all participants.
This is not the first instance where Cheuko’s actions have drawn scrutiny since the Argentine superstar’s arrival on American soil. Prior to this latest Leagues Cup ban, his presence and perceived involvement in on-field situations had already sparked debate. Notably, Atlas defender Matheus Doria had publicly voiced his concerns, questioning the appropriateness of a security guard’s involvement in altercations between players, indicating a pre-existing discussion about the boundaries of such roles.
Doria’s criticism centered on the belief that while a bodyguard’s primary duty is to protect a player from fan interference, their involvement in disputes among athletes crosses a line. He articulated that such interventions fall outside the scope of typical security responsibilities, emphasizing that disciplinary matters and player interactions should remain exclusive to those on the pitch and the official authorities. His perspective underscored the need for clear guidelines for player safety protocols.
The incident and subsequent Leagues Cup ban raise broader questions about the role of high-profile security personnel in professional sports environments. While the protection of superstar athletes is paramount, the fine line between security and active participation in on-field events requires careful navigation. This event serves as a stark reminder for clubs and leagues worldwide to clearly define the parameters within which security details operate to prevent future controversies and ensure the smooth running of competitions.
