Recent developments indicate a significant shift in the global energy landscape as Russian energy entities, particularly Rosatom, grapple with severe financial constraints, casting shadows over their ambitious international project commitments, especially in Central Asia.
Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear energy agency, is openly acknowledging its struggle to secure necessary financing for future projects, prompting questions about its ability to maintain its prominent role in the international nuclear energy market. A top official, Andrei Petrov, recently conveyed before the Russian State Commission on Energy that while ongoing work is sustainable, a substantial financial injection will be critical by 2027 to initiate new ventures and uphold its competitive edge.
The specific nature and precise amount of the financial assistance sought by Rosatom remain somewhat elusive, with officials, including Rosatom’s chief Alexei Likhachev, broadly referring to the need for “special resources.” Reports suggest the company is seeking state-subsidized, low-interest loans, a mechanism crucial for navigating the challenging global economic climate and countering the effects of international restrictions.
The lack of adequate state financial backing is already impacting Rosatom’s developmental efforts, hindering the progress of new thermal and nuclear unit designs, specifically units Shelf-M and Elena-AM. This financial strain threatens to impede the modernization and expansion of their nuclear energy portfolio, potentially ceding ground to emerging competitors.
Compounding Russia’s energy sector challenges, Kazakhstan has unilaterally decided to proceed with the independent construction of three thermal power plants near Kokshetau, Semey, and Ust-Kamenogorsk. This decision follows the non-materialization of promised Russian financing from Inter RAO, another state-controlled Russian firm, which had initially secured the $2.7 billion contract.
Deputy Kazakh Prime Minister Roman Sklyar confirmed the termination of the Inter RAO contract, citing the Russian firm’s inability to secure “export financing at a low rate.” This development directly raises concerns regarding the future of Rosatom’s agreement to construct Kazakhstan’s inaugural nuclear power station, a deal initially contingent on Rosatom’s capacity to arrange the requisite funding.
Intriguingly, Kazakhstan simultaneously announced in June that China’s National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) would be contracted to build a second nuclear power plant. While initially perceived as a diplomatic move to balance relations with two major regional powers, this decision is now increasingly viewed as a strategic hedge against potential financial instabilities from the Russian side.
Further solidifying this strategic shift, Deputy Prime Minister Sklyar, on July 31, effectively signaled a lack of confidence in Rosatom’s delivery capabilities by announcing CNNC’s leadership in constructing an additional nuclear power plant in Kazakhstan. This move underscores Kazakhstan’s pragmatic approach to its energy future, prioritizing reliable partnerships and robust financing.
These unfolding events highlight a critical juncture for Russia’s nuclear industry and its global reach. The financial pressures, coupled with the strategic recalibrations by key partners like Kazakhstan, suggest a potential reshaping of international energy alliances and a growing diversification in nuclear power plant construction leadership.