Keir Starmer’s current approach to the Palestine issue marks a significant departure from the human rights advocacy that once defined his public persona and political promises.
During his 2020 Labour leadership campaign, Starmer prominently featured a commitment to a human rights-based foreign policy, a stance underscored by his legal opposition to the Iraq War and representation of asylum seekers.
However, a noticeable shift has occurred, with the politician exhibiting a caution regarding perceived Israeli violations of international law in Gaza that stands in stark contrast to the conviction of his former self and many contemporaries.
While the prospect of UK recognition of a Palestinian state is a welcome, albeit overdue, signal against the mounting international revulsion at events in Gaza, framing it as a punitive measure for Netanyahu’s behavior risks trivializing a fundamental right.
Speculation surrounds the motivations for Starmer’s hesitant strategy, with suggestions ranging from international political maneuvering to an unexpected apprehension, despite strong public support for recognition and a firmer stance against Israeli actions.
It is crucial to acknowledge that the abhorrent war crimes committed by Hamas on October 7, 2023, do not and cannot serve as justification for the extensive suffering and devastation inflicted upon civilians in Gaza over the subsequent 22 months of conflict.
True commitment to Palestinian statehood necessitates proactive international steps to counter ongoing efforts to impede its realization, including addressing the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the relentless expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank.
The UK, particularly under Starmer’s leadership, possesses an opportunity to foster greater European consensus on this issue, leveraging relationships with leaders like Macron and Merz to advocate for more decisive diplomatic action.
Ultimately, for his foreign policy to regain the respect and integrity he once championed, Starmer must reconcile his current political strategy with the unwavering human rights principles that were once the cornerstone of his public identity.
